M1I so move
Passed
all in favor; opposed none heard
Meetings
Loading records…
Loading records…
Tuesday, June 27, 2017
Agenda
Not posted
What was on the agenda.
Packet
Not posted
The supporting materials council reviewed.
Minutes
Not posted
The official record of what happened.
Agenda items below are drawn from the packet; outcomes will not appear until minutes are added.
One-line summary
The commission heard strong public concern about a 181st-area commercial/light-industrial land-use change, continued that public hearing to July, discussed Bill's Superette and Greenwalt items, recommended Laestadian Lutheran's landscape plan, and began discussing lower-cost administrative lot split approvals.
9 items as recorded in the packet and minutes.
A1Call to order, pledge, meeting policy, and roll call
Call to order, pledge, meeting policy, and roll call.
minutes not available in this bundle
A2Approve or amend meeting agenda
Approve or amend the June 27 meeting agenda.
minutes not available in this bundle
A3Approve or amend May 30, 2017 Planning and Zoning minutes
Approve or amend the May 30, 2017 Planning and Zoning meeting minutes.
minutes not available in this bundle
A4Floor items
Floor items before the public hearing.
minutes not available in this bundle
A5Public hearing: Rodmaker/Racler comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning
Public hearing on a joint request by Grant Rodmaker and Kent Racler to amend the 2030 comprehensive land use plan and rezone property near 181st.
minutes not available in this bundle
A6Bill's Superette CUP for new diesel pump setback deviation
Bill's Superette conditional use permit discussion for a new diesel pump deviating from the 5-foot parking setback.
minutes not available in this bundle
A7Greenwalt conceptual subdivision plan, 8301 181st Avenue
Greenwalt conceptual subdivision plan for property at 8301 181st Avenue.
minutes not available in this bundle
A8Laestadian Lutheran landscape plan
Review of a revised landscape plan required under the approved conditional use permit for Laestadian Lutheran.
minutes not available in this bundle
A9Ordinance amendment: lot line configuration and lot splits
Discussion of possible ordinance amendments for lot line configurations and some lot splits to be approved administratively.
minutes not available in this bundle
What this meeting did about specific topics, organized by issue rather than by document.
routine approvals
The commission handled routine business by approving the meeting agenda and the May 30, 2017 Planning and Zoning minutes, with both motions carried according to the transcript.
Agenda: A2, A3. Motions: M1, M2. Speakers: commissioner Mullen, commissioner Perell.
Rodmaker/Racler 181st comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning
The commission opened a public hearing on a request to change about 41 acres from rural residential to commercial/light manufacturing and some commercial/industrial zoning. Staff said some required notices had not been sent, so the commission heard public comments and then carried a motion to continue the public hearing to the July meeting.
Agenda: A5. Motions: M3. Speakers: Grant rodmaker, Kent racler, Clayton Conley, Dr Mary wolton, Nick Wolverton, Brenda Neil, Janice turland, Brandon Ebert, Andrea, Mike Carlson, Kevin Feist, David Johnson, Tracy con.
Bill's Superette diesel pump CUP
The commission discussed additional engineering and county information for Bill's Superette's diesel pump CUP, including drainage, ponding, a turn lane, driveway access, landscaping, and whether any work should be paid for by the city, but the transcript states that no motion was needed that night.
Agenda: A6. Speakers: Mayor Pon, planner, Grant R maker.
Greenwalt conceptual subdivision
The Greenwalts presented a concept for a minor subdivision and later platting of property on 181st Avenue. The commission and staff discussed whether initial lots could be split, how future roads might connect north-south, wetlands, park dedication, setbacks, and traffic, and staff said no decision was required at that time.
Agenda: A7. Speakers: Greenwalt, planner, Mayor Pon.
Laestadian Lutheran landscape plan
The commission reviewed the revised landscape plan required under Laestadian Lutheran's approved CUP. Staff said the plan met plant-number and mix requirements, and the commission carried a motion to accept the plan and send it to the city council.
Agenda: A8. Motions: M4. Speakers: planner, commissioner jurgus, commissioner Moen.
administrative approval of simple lot splits and lot line reconfigurations
The commission discussed possible ordinance language to let some lot line reconfigurations and simple lot splits be handled administratively to reduce resident costs. The discussion focused on what threshold should still require Planning and Zoning review, especially where new streets or more complex splits are involved.
Agenda: A9. Speakers: planner, Mayor Pon, commissioner Wagner.
4 motions on the record. Split votes are highlighted.
M1I so move
all in favor; opposed none heard
M2I'll make a motion to approve
moved by commissioner Mullen, seconded by commissioner Perell
all in favor; opposed none heard
M3I will make a motion to continue this um public hearing until July's meeting
moved by commissioner Perell, seconded by commissioner Wagner
all in favor; opposed none heard
M4accept this plan here send to the city council
moved by commissioner jurgus, seconded by commissioner Moen
all in favor; opposed none heard
Each figure links back to the document it came from. When the council voted on the amount, the motion is shown.
F1
Existing fee described during discussion of administrative approval for lot splits and lot line reconfigurations.
fee · lot split application fee
$200
inflow
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F2
Existing escrow described during discussion of administrative approval for lot splits and lot line reconfigurations.
fee · lot split escrow
$1,000
inflow
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F3
Planner said the escrow was sometimes reduced when the review was expected to be short.
fee · reduced lot split escrow
$500
inflow
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F4
Regular rate discussed for planner review time.
fee · regular planning rate
$120
inflow
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F5
Proposed lower hourly rate for zoning administration review.
fee · zoning administration hourly rate
$60
inflow
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F6
Planner suggested a possible standard fee amount.
fee · possible standard flat fee
$200
inflow
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F7
Planner estimated the prior average review cost as a range.
estimate · estimated prior review cost lower end
$300
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F8
Planner estimated the prior average review cost as a range.
estimate · estimated prior review cost upper end
$400
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F9
Planner estimated the proposed lower review cost as a range.
estimate · estimated proposed review cost lower end
$200
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
F10
Planner estimated the proposed lower review cost as a range.
estimate · estimated proposed review cost upper end
$250
unknown
Council approval status: not yet on record.
When someone tried to remember earlier business, we cross-reference the corpus and write a short related-history note.
the 2030 land use plan which is in place right now was adopted in 2009 so that is our present guide for the city
— city planner
What this is about
The current 2030 comprehensive land use plan and the city’s ongoing 2040 comprehensive plan update.
The resolver has not run for this cue, or the search did not find a strong match in the corpus.
recently the city has gone through two other comprehensive plan amendments that uh one of which removed 80 acres of commercial industrial land
— city planner
What this is about
Prior comprehensive plan amendments that removed commercial/industrial land from the 2030 land use plan.
The resolver has not run for this cue, or the search did not find a strong match in the corpus.
the the 80 acres that was spoken of previously then when planner Stockman mentioned that 80 acres came out a a homeowner bought land bought a farm just down here on five and and South 22 and they wanted that rezoned out of commercial back to rural residential EG
— mayor
What this is about
The earlier 80-acre comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning back to rural residential for a homeowner with horses and children.
The resolver has not run for this cue, or the search did not find a strong match in the corpus.
I read up on that and I saw that uh the East End of burns Parkway may need some realignment and they're talking about addressing it at this time
— Brandon
What this is about
A prior discussion of possible Burns Parkway realignment during an earlier land-use change.
The resolver has not run for this cue, or the search did not find a strong match in the corpus.
that was discussed as part of that overall land use change there um at the present time the city council decided to leave it as is
— city planner
What this is about
How the city council and Anoka County previously handled Burns Parkway realignment as part of a land-use change.
The resolver has not run for this cue, or the search did not find a strong match in the corpus.
we used to pay 50 I know and you had to come in with your uh registered survey of the you know and that was on top of that of course
— chair
What this is about
Old lot split fees before the current fee-and-escrow structure.
The resolver has not run for this cue, or the search did not find a strong match in the corpus.
Every document and recording archived for this meeting.
The structured brief on this page is auto-generated and may need correction. The PDFs and the meeting recording remain the official record.