Agenda spine

6 items as recorded in the packet and minutes.

1. 1aPreliminary boring reports

   Preliminary boring reports and road surface discussion for Ebony & Garnet Street and Dolomite.

   No vote was recorded; staff will provide more information when core samples come in and Nelson will attend the April meeting.

   • Ebony and Garnet Street borings
   • Dolomite road surface

   Discussion only
   p. 1↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)1a. Preliminary boring reports Nelson explained that he does not have the Ebony & Garnet Street boring sample reports yet. He explained the borings that he has received. The higher the N Value, the better. At the last meeting residents inquired about leaving Dolomite as a gravel surface. Nelson prepared a cost analysi…

2. 2bChanges to City Code to be consistent with Comp Plan Update

   Discussion of code changes so city road requirements match the Comprehensive Plan update.

   No vote was recorded; a public hearing is to be added to the April City Council meeting.

   • city code update
   • road standards
   • Comprehensive Plan

   Discussion only
   p. 1↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)2b. Changes to City Code to be consistent with Comp Plan Update Stockman said that our current ordinance requires all new houses to have a paved road. Should it be gravel or paved? Who maintains it? We have been inconsistent. We need to hold everyone to the same standards. We have to make sure that we have road standar…

3. 1bRoad Weight Restriction Permit Discussion

   Discussion of permits for vehicles exceeding gravel road axle weight restrictions.

   Council chose not to consider overweight permits at this time.

   • road weight restrictions
   • overweight permits

   No action
   p. 1↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)1b. Road Weight Restriction Permit Discussion All gravel roads have a 5 ton axle weight limit. Council chose not to consider overweight permits at this time.

4. UN1Roessler / Joe Green property split administrative handling

   Discussion of whether Planner Stockman could administratively handle a possible split of property at County Road 47 and 22 involving Roessler and Joe Green.

   Motion carried to allow Stockman to handle splits of 10 acres and larger administratively, with smaller splits returning to Council.

   • Roessler property
   • Joe Green property split
   • administrative review

   Approved
   p. 2↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)Stockman discussed the property located at the intersection of County Road 47 & 22 is currently owned by Roessler. Joe Green wants to buy it. Can he split a portion to sell, the rest to farm? Stockman asked if they would be comfortable with her doing it administratively. MOTION FOR STOCKMAN TO HANDLE ADMINISTRATIVELY …

5. 2aEstablishment of the RRT, Rural Residential Transition District

   Discussion of the proposed Rural Residential Transition District.

   The item was postponed to another workshop date.

   • Rural Residential Transition District
   • net land area

   Continued
   p. 2↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)2a. Establishment of the RRT, Rural Residential Transition District This will be postponed for another workshop date. Engineer Nelson and Planner Stockman will meet to discuss the net land area in order for us to be consistent.

6. SCHED1Next workshop scheduling

   Scheduling the next workshop.

   The minutes state the next workshop will be scheduled for Tuesday, March 31 at 6 pm.

   • meeting scheduling

   Discussion only
   p. 2↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)Next workshop will be scheduled for Tuesday, March 31st at 6 pm

Issues addressed

What this meeting did about specific topics, organized by issue rather than by document.

• Ebony and Garnet Street borings and Dolomite road surface

  Nelson reported on preliminary boring information, said he did not yet have the Ebony & Garnet Street boring sample reports, and discussed residents’ prior request about leaving Dolomite as gravel. He prepared a paved-road versus gravel-road maintenance cost analysis and recommended paving the section; more information is expected when core samples come in.

  Agenda: 1a. Speakers: Nelson.

• City Code road standards update tied to the Comprehensive Plan

  Stockman raised the need to make City Code consistent with the Comprehensive Plan update, especially whether new-house access roads must be paved or can be gravel and who maintains them. Nelson noted fire-code access requirements, and Stockman said she would like to pursue an ordinance amendment with a public hearing at the April City Council meeting.

  Agenda: 2b. Speakers: Stockman, Nelson.

• Road weight restriction permits

  The Council discussed gravel-road weight restrictions, noted that all gravel roads have a 5-ton axle weight limit, and chose not to consider overweight permits at this time.

  Agenda: 1b.

• Roessler / Joe Green property split administrative review

  Stockman discussed property at County Road 47 and 22 owned by Roessler that Joe Green wants to buy and possibly split. Council carried a motion allowing Stockman to handle splits of 10 acres and larger administratively, while smaller splits would return to Council for discussion.

  Agenda: UN1. Motions: M1. Speakers: Stockman, Pilon, Greenberg.

• Rural Residential Transition District

  The establishment of the RRT, Rural Residential Transition District, was postponed to another workshop. Nelson and Stockman will meet to discuss net land area so the city can be consistent.

  Agenda: 2a. Speakers: Nelson, Stockman.

• Next workshop scheduling

  The next workshop was scheduled for Tuesday, March 31 at 6 pm.

  Agenda: SCHED1.

Motions and votes

1 motion on the record. Split votes are highlighted.

• M1MOTION FOR STOCKMAN TO HANDLE ADMINISTRATIVELY FOR 10 ACRES AND LARGER, SMALLER THAN 10 ACRES WOULD BE SENT BACK TO COUNCIL FOR DISCUSSION BY PILON, SECONDED BY GREENBERG; ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION CARRIED.

  moved by Pilon, seconded by Greenberg

  Passed

  • YMayor Pilon
  • YCouncil Member Breyen
  • YCouncil Member Greenberg
  • YCouncil Member Blake
  • ·Council Member Rainville

  p. 1↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)Members in Attendance: Mayor Pilon, Council Member Breyen, Council Member Greenberg, Council Member Blake Members Absent: Council Member Rainvillep. 2↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)MOTION FOR STOCKMAN TO HANDLE ADMINISTRATIVELY FOR 10 ACRES AND LARGER, SMALLER THAN 10 ACRES WOULD BE SENT BACK TO COUNCIL FOR DISCUSSION BY PILON, SECONDED BY GREENBERG; ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION CARRIED.

Memory cues and prior history

When someone tried to remember earlier business, we cross-reference the corpus and write a short related-history note.

• At the last meeting residents inquired about leaving Dolomite as a gravel surface.

  — Nelson

  What this is about
  Residents’ prior request to leave Dolomite as a gravel surface, prompting a paved-road versus gravel-road maintenance cost analysis.

  p. 1↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)At the last meeting residents inquired about leaving Dolomite as a gravel surface. Nelson prepared a cost analysis to maintain paved roads vs gravel roads. Nelson recommends paving this section.

  Related history

  The records show this came up at the February 13, 2020 public hearing for the 189th Lane, 190th Lane and Dolomite Street road project. Estelle Rolstad asked whether Dolomite, especially where there were properties without homes, could be turned back into a gravel road to save money. Engineer Nelson responded that there would be maintenance issues, especially because it is difficult to maintain a gravel segment between two paved roads and keep gravel off the paved surfaces. At the March 12, 2020 work session, the minutes specifically state that “at the last meeting residents inquired about leaving Dolomite as a gravel surface.” Nelson then presented a cost analysis comparing maintenance of paved roads versus gravel roads and recommended paving that section. Later records show the road project continued: at the July 14, 2020 meeting, the agenda included Resolution 2020-44 accepting a bid and awarding the contract for the 189th Lane, 190th Lane and Dolomite Street Road Improvement Project, with noted cost savings of a little over $11,000 and an estimated new cost of about $6,180 per resident. The excerpt provided does not include the recorded vote outcome.

  • ·Feb 13, 2020<!-- PageBreak --> <!-- PageNumber="Page 3" --> City of Nowthen Public Hearing Meeting February 13, 2020 Estelle Rolstad
  • ·Apr 14, 2026WRIGHT HENNEPIN SECURITY <table> <tr> <th>MEMORIAL PARK PAVILION AND 2 BATHROOMS</th> <th></th> </tr> <tr> <td>Feature</
  • ·Mar 12, 2020# Nowthen City Council Regular Meeting MINUTES March 12, 2020 7:00 PM Workshop began at 7:00 pm by Mayor Pilon Members i
  • ·Apr 30, 2020<!-- PageBreak --> <!-- PageHeader="City of Nowthen City Council Meeting Thursday, April 30, 2020" --> 189th Lane, 190th
  • ·Jan 14, 2020<!-- PageBreak --> ## 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this feasibility report is to present the City of Nowthen with a p

• We have been inconsistent.

  — Stockman

  What this is about
  Past inconsistency in applying city road standards for new houses and paved or gravel roads.

  p. 1↗Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)Stockman said that our current ordinance requires all new houses to have a paved road. Should it be gravel or paved? Who maintains it? We have been inconsistent. We need to hold everyone to the same standards.

  Related history

  The records I searched do not contain a prior decision matching this recollection about inconsistent application of city road standards for new houses on paved versus gravel roads. There are partial matches on related road-standard topics. At the July 22, 2025 Planning and Zoning meeting, staff discussed a concept plan with road-access issues, future road connections, local-road setback requirements, and county limits on access points, but the minutes do not show a decision about paved/gravel road standards for new homes. In the February 24 and March 10, 2026 packets for Jays Services, staff noted that the ordinance allows more employees for an extended home occupation if the property is fully accessed by paved roads, and that 190th Avenue NW is paved; that was about home-occupation eligibility, not new-house road standards. The other road-related records found concern maintenance and assessments, such as resident comments on proposed road work at the June 17, 2025 meeting and a 2026 overlay assessment resolution in the May 12, 2026 packet. Those records do not document a prior council decision applying different road standards to new houses.

  • ·Jun 17, 2025<!-- PageBreak --> Dave Ross (6060 189th Lane) expressed that the road is fine except for expansion joints, which he bel
  • ·Apr 14, 2026<!-- PageBreak --> <!-- PageNumber="78" --> Bertram Asphalt Company P.O. Box 162 Paynesville, MN 56362 Cell: 320-292-131
  • ·Mar 10, 2026<!-- PageBreak --> <!-- PageNumber="179" --> <!-- PageHeader="Jays Services - 8704 190th Ave NW February 11, 2026" --> p
  • ·Feb 24, 2026<!-- PageBreak --> <!-- PageNumber="5" --> <!-- PageHeader="Jays Services - 8704 190th Ave NW February 11, 2026" --> pro
  • ·Aug 26, 2025<!-- PageBreak --> <!-- PageNumber="3" --> Planner Nash displayed the concept plan and provided several comments on the

Sources

Every document and recording archived for this meeting.

• Document

  Meeting City Council Work Session — Minutes (2020-03-12)

  Minutes · 2020-03-12

  2 pages

  ↗